I'd like some input from those around here who have been working with OSC, PHP, Google, etc for longer trhan me (after all, I have been using OSC for just about a year).
I have a working store based on OSCMAX that is very nicely found on Google search results on some given keywords I am interested. This site has a quite basic template, tables and text, no graphics (this how I usually like it). It is right now working great.
Twisted Tienda : CCTV, videovigilancia, camaras, minicamaras, seguridad - Bienvenidos a www.twistedtienda.com
Now, where my problems begin. I have kind of a copy of this store (it is actually a Multi Stores installation), both stores are running with the same engine underneath. Differences on both stores are mainly cosmetic. This store has been under construction for maybe 3 months, it was only on a new domain name, and Google had been indexing it. It was being found quite nicely on first page on some given keywords, looking great as the previous store.
SECURAME : Tu mayorista de CCTV, videovigilancia, camaras, minicamaras, seguridad - Bienvenidos a www.securame.com
It officially launched on Sep 1st, I spend the last days of august working on the store template, which until then was about the same on the first store. We had someone dessign the "look" of the store, the store name, etc, and he did about everything, header, boxes with graphical borders, etc, which then had to me moved to a BTS template/PHP/OSCMAX and so on. It had to be integrated on the store.
So it was me who had to do it, and I had never done anything like this previously (as I say, I kinda prefer a simple look, with no unnecessary graphics, I am used to things like remote desktop/VNC and I hate anything that moves or flashes on a web site without a good reason)
What I basically did was turn the boxes into a 3x3 <table>, where every <td> had its background. The header became a <table> where every tab was 3 <td>s with a given background, the central modules had a header also that was a <table> with backgounr on the <td>s. Everything looked great, but my w3c validation of course went to hell.
Now, I think that a background="" on a <table>, <td> or <tr> is not a good idea. After checking other graphical borders contributions for OSCommerce, I see that the way to do it is by having a <td> and then an <img> inside, or creating a style with backgound on your CSS, and then using it with a <td class="">
To the point, the search results on that domain dropped from one day to the other. I really could not point the exact moment/reason since there have been almost small changes, but of course the biggest change was the template switch. And the other store is still doing ok on Google, so my guess is that whatever is wrong should be template related, which is the only different part on both stores.
I was about to go back to a text template, but I think I fixed the graphics template for now, so I will wait a few days before doing so. But does it make sense that it could have dropped on Google results for those changes I did wrongly? And does it make sense that now that they are fixed it will slowly go up on results again?
Any comments are welcome, thanks!





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks










Bookmarks