This is a discussion on Re: Security Patch within the osCMax v1.7 Discussion forums, part of the osCMax v1.7 Forums category; Originally Posted by bdneuman you just put the variable in application_top to make the initial definition? Actually I would not ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
(I would add it to configure_bts.php, but I'm not sure if osCMax even has a configure_bts file, and for safety application_top is at least as good of course). If you set the variables to '', the script will be safer because it won't be possible to inject malicious code into variables anymore (assuming normal flow). Quote:
(just to be clear, I would use it as an addition to msasek's fix, so not i.s.o.) |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Couple of questions here. I have a couple of stores. One running MAX 1.5 and one running MAX 1.7. I'm all fixed on the 1.7 one. The 1.5 version, I noticed that in some of the template folders, there is no popup.tpl.php file, but only the main_page.tpl.php file. Do I just update what's there and not worry about anything else? Also, I'm in a good or bad habit of copying and renaming all files before I change anything, so I always have a copy of the original. If I rename main_page.tpl.php to mainpageorig.old, and then fix the main_page.tpl.php file, am I okay, or am I still very vulnerable because the actual code that's being exploited is still on my server under a different name? So, I guess the question is, is this security risk in the actual code, or is it linked to the filename as well? Am I okay having the original, renamed, and the modified version still on my server? I asked Mom and she didn't know. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Code: unset($javascript,$content,$content_template,$boxLink); ( anyone knows any more vars to add to the above list?) I would like to repeat this one: Quote:
@goaskmom: about the differences between MAX versions I don't know anything. I would just do a search for $javascript and $content_template inside the whole templates (sub)folders if I were you, and make sure the "basename fixes" are applied to all instances you find. Unfixed renamed files on the server of course can allways be a security risk, allthough it's very unlikely these would/could be exploited (who knows the names of these files?), I would not take the risk on a live store. Paul |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| We have an osC shop set up and have BTS installed. We were hacked by the "SpyKids from Brazil" No real damage done but scared the heck out of us. Anybody else get hit? |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| osCMax 2.0RC2 Security Patch/Update 051112 | wilde-uk | osCMax v2 Installation issues | 5 | 04-12-2006 07:45 PM |
| Blank default page after did the security patch | alphaque | osCMax v2 Installation issues | 6 | 03-27-2006 02:35 AM |
| Security Patch osCMax 2.0RC2 | warrenthewindmill | osCMax v1.7 Discussion | 2 | 12-04-2005 10:50 AM |
| osCMax 2.0RC2 Security Patch/Update 051112 | michael_s | osCMax v2 Announcements | 0 | 11-27-2005 10:12 AM |
| Security patch killed pop-up function | bjrafferty | osCMax v1.7 Discussion | 2 | 03-24-2005 01:13 PM |